It’s no secret that I’m not a fan of the portfolio construction advice that comes out of Wall Street. That’s why this article caught my eye this morning, it’s not often that someone will break from the consensus and offer new ideas. It’s not exactly right, but it’s close……

Wall Street is still selling you a bond-heavy framework designed for 1987. Here's a better architecture — one that Harry Browne figured out decades ago, and that today's macro reality demands you upgrade.

 THE WAKE-UP CALL

This week, a major European bank made a splash by telling clients to hold 45% of their portfolios in gold, silver, and bitcoin — and zero in bonds. The financial press covered it like a revelation.

It isn't a revelation. It's a permission slip.

Because what Berenberg Bank described is Wall Street finally, slowly, reluctantly acknowledging what anyone paying attention has known for years: the 60/40 portfolio is structurally broken. The model was engineered for a world of falling interest rates, globalized supply chains, sound sovereign balance sheets, and a unipolar America. That world is gone.

Berenberg deserves credit for saying it out loud. But their framework — hard assets against growth equities, zero fixed income — is better than the consensus, not better than possible. It lacks an explicit tail-risk hedge. It doesn't address what replaces bonds as a stability sleeve. And the equity allocation is still generic.

There's a more complete architecture. And it didn't originate on a trading desk in Frankfurt.

It started with a libertarian economist named Harry Browne, who solved most of this problem in 1981.

THE ORIGINAL GENIUS: HARRY BROWNE'S PERMANENT PORTFOLIO

In 1981, Harry Browne published a simple but devastating insight: any economy, at any given time, is operating in one of four possible states — Prosperity, Inflation, Deflation, or Recession. Each state rewards a different asset class.

His solution was elegant in its simplicity: own 25% in each of the four assets that thrive in each economic regime.

The results were remarkable. From 1972 through 2020, the Permanent Portfolio compounded at roughly 8% annually with a maximum drawdown well below 15%. The 60/40 portfolio had a deeper max drawdown and similar long-run returns — but required you to stomach significantly more volatility.

More importantly, the Permanent Portfolio never had a catastrophic year. Even in 2008, it finished down only around 2%. While the 60/40 crowd was down 25-30%, Browne's framework was quietly collecting insurance proceeds from its gold and T-bill positions.

The framework was brilliant for its time. But it has one fatal flaw in 2026: the bond quadrant. The deflationary hedge Browne relied on — long-duration Treasuries — has become a liability in an era of fiscal dominance, persistent inflation, and sovereign debt that cannot plausibly be repaid in real terms. Note: this isn't a blanket indictment of all fixed income. T-bills still play a role in this architecture. The problem is term risk — owning duration in a world where the long end of the curve can reprice against you without warning.

Berenberg figured this out. So have a handful of converts who've been making the rounds on the conference circuit. But their solution still stops short of what the current environment actually demands.

Here's a version built for the world that actually exists today.

THE MODERN PERMANENT PORTFOLIO: FOUR QUADRANTS, ZERO COMPROMISES

The architecture retains Browne's core insight — own assets that don't move together, and let the regime do the work — but replaces every quadrant with a more powerful version of the same thesis.

Quadrant 1 — 25% THEMATIC EQUITY  (replaces plain S&P exposure)

The original portfolio's equity slice was just the market. The problem with that today is that the S&P 500 is 30%+ technology concentration and is extraordinarily sensitive to rate changes, dollar strength, and multiple compression. When those tailwinds reverse — as they are — the index underperforms dramatically.

The replacement thesis is what I call HALO equity: Heavy Asset, Low Obsolescence. Think industries where the physical world cannot be disintermediated by software. Energy infrastructure. Water. Mining. Industrial equipment. Shipping. Defense primes. These businesses own real things that are hard to replicate and increasingly valuable in a deglobalizing, reindustrializing economy.

Layer on top of that select thematic exposures — AI infrastructure plays where the hardware is the moat, not the software, memory, photonics, etc — and you have an equity book that actually thrives when the index struggles.

This quadrant prospers in the Prosperity regime, same as Browne intended. But unlike the S&P, it also provides partial inflation protection because the underlying assets are real. You're not just buying earnings growth. You're buying replacement value.

Quadrant 2 — 25% BETTER THAN BONDS  (replaces fixed income entirely)

Browne put bonds in the portfolio to hedge deflation and collect income. In 2026, long-duration Treasuries offer neither. With term risk elevated and sovereign balance sheets globally impaired, a 10-year bond isn't a hedge — it's a slow-motion duration problem waiting to reprice.

The replacement is a hybrid of two underappreciated, structurally defensive assets: property & casualty insurance stocks and cash-at-par instruments with embedded optionality.

P&C insurers are the closest thing to a bond alternative in today's environment. They generate float — premium income collected before claims are paid — and invest that float in short-duration instruments. In an inflationary, higher-for-longer rate world, they collect higher reinvestment yields while simultaneously raising premiums because replacement costs keep rising. Their pricing power is directly tied to the same inflation that is killing your bonds. Allstate, Markel, Fairfax Financial: these are bond replacements wearing equity clothes.

The second component is cash-at-par instruments with embedded optionality. One practical implementation: pre-merger SPACs purchased near trust value. Before you eye-roll: forget 2021. This is not that. A SPAC trading at or near its $10 trust NAV is a money-market instrument with a call option on a merger catalyst. If the deal is garbage, you redeem. If it's good, you participate. The rule is simple — only buy near the trust floor, understand the redemption mechanics, and keep duration short. Used correctly, it's a cash-management tool with upside. Most portfolio managers haven't looked at this structure since the hype cycle burned them. That's exactly why the opportunity exists.

This quadrant is your stability sleeve. It won't double, but it won't blow up either.

Quadrant 3 — 25% HARD MONEY + DIGITAL CREDIT  (replaces and upgrades Browne's gold)

Browne was right about gold. He was right that fiat money is inherently debased, that central banks will always err toward accommodation, and that hard money protects purchasing power over time. In 1981, gold was the only practical implementation.

In 2026, the thesis is identical but the toolkit has expanded.

Gold remains the bedrock. It's the monetary metal with 5,000 years of institutional memory. Central banks — especially in the Global South — are buying aggressively and show no sign of stopping. Gold performs when the dollar weakens, when sovereign credit quality deteriorates, and when the market reprices geopolitical risk. We own it through physical ETFs and physical gold itself. (Note: gold miners could also be in the HALO equity sleeve — they're levered gold beta with operational risk, not monetary insurance.)

Bitcoin is the digital complement. It is not a trading vehicle in this portfolio — it is a protocol-enforced scarce asset with asymmetric upside as institutional adoption continues its multi-decade arc. The 21 million cap is baked into the code. No central banker, no Treasury Secretary, no executive order can change that. It is not a rate-sensitive asset. It is the only financial instrument on earth with a verifiably fixed supply.

The third component is digital credit — overcollateralized, on-chain lending structures that behave more like short-duration credit than venture speculation. This is not altcoin roulette. We're talking about protocols where borrowers post more collateral than they borrow, where liquidation happens automatically, and where yields are real rather than token-inflated. Demand collateral. Demand transparency. Size it small. But own the thesis early — this is what the next generation of credit infrastructure looks like.

Together, this quadrant is your inflation insurance policy. When Berenberg talks about 45% in 'gold plus,' they're describing a rough sketch of this. We're building it with precision.

Quadrant 4 — 25% TAIL RISK + LIQUIDITY  (replaces cash with active protection)

Browne's cash sleeve was T-bills. That remains part of the answer. But the current environment — elevated geopolitical risk, stretched equity valuations, fragile banking systems, potential black swan events including sovereign debt crises and currency dislocations — demands something more surgical.

This quadrant is divided between dedicated tail risk strategy and short-duration liquidity. And yes — T-bills appear twice in this architecture. That's intentional. The T-bills in Quadrant 2 are there for stability and income replacement. The T-bills here are reload capital — dry powder that exists precisely so you're not forced to sell anything when the regime violently shifts. Two different jobs. Both matter.

Dedicated tail risk managers — firms like Universa Investments, or funds that systematically purchase deep out-of-the-money puts on equity indices — don't exist to make money in normal markets. They exist to generate enormous returns precisely when everything else is collapsing. The math is counterintuitive: a small allocation to a strategy that returns 1,000%+ in a crash can offset catastrophic losses in the other three quadrants. Mark Spitznagel has written extensively about this. The research is compelling. Tail risk protection is not a cost — it is structural leverage on your other positions' ability to survive and recover.

The remaining portion sits in short-duration T-bills and money market instruments — zero duration, no credit risk, maximum optionality. When the market dislocates, you act. When others are being margin-called, you're shopping.

Rebalance the whole portfolio quarterly, or whenever any sleeve drifts more than five to seven percentage points from its target. That's it. The discipline is the strategy.

This quadrant is the one most portfolio managers skip. They consider it a drag. They're wrong. It's the structural foundation that keeps the whole architecture intact when the regime shifts.

WINNERS

PRESSURE POINTS

BEAR CASE

FIVE TAKEAWAYS

1. 60/40 is not just outdated — it is structurally wrong. The bond quadrant was designed for a deflationary world. We live in a fiscally dominant, inflationary one. Holding long-duration bonds as a portfolio ballast in 2026 is the equivalent of buying flood insurance in a desert.

2. Harry Browne solved the framework in 1981. The Permanent Portfolio's four-regime logic — own something for every macro environment — remains the correct architecture. What needs updating is the implementation, not the theory.

3. Replace long-duration bonds with stability engines. P&C insurance stocks collect float and raise premiums in the same inflationary environment that kills your bonds. Cash-at-par instruments with embedded optionality — like pre-merger SPACs near trust value, used correctly — give you money-market yield without locking up duration. Neither will double. Both will survive.

4. Hard money means gold AND bitcoin, properly sized. Gold is the institutional anchor. Bitcoin is the asymmetric bet on the digitization of that same monetary thesis. Digital credit is the emerging front edge. Own all three with conviction, not speculation.

5. Tail risk is not optional. Dedicated tail risk exposure — whether through options, managed volatility strategies, or tail funds — transforms the portfolio from one that survives crises to one that actually benefits from them. This is the quadrant Wall Street skips. It is also the quadrant that will define who wins the next decade.

Space Exposure Designed For Potential Weekly Payouts

The space economy is no longer just a government program — it’s becoming part of a global industry that is gradually advancing.

But why view long-term growth as the only potential path forward? 

SPCI seeks to offer approximately 100% concentrated exposure to the space industry while striving to generate weekly income through a disciplined put credit spread options strategy. 

Gain exposure to the “final frontier” and a potential weekly distribution while you wait for the theme to play out.

Discover SPCI.

Distributor: Foreside Fund Services | Investing involves risk including possible loss of principle.

Yesterday we had a bit of a sell off, most likely on continued issues in Iran. Today we see stories of two ships being fired on in the Strait of Hormuz and markets look to have recouped most of yesterday’s losses. Meanwhile, oil is back above $90…..

I haven’t talked much about Bitcoin lately, probably because I’m still recovering from PTSD on the drop from $120. But it’s quietly built a base of support and looks to be in a solid, yet un parabolic, uptrend……

Perhaps it’s because whoever was manipulating the market at 10am every day is gone, or perhaps the correct has run it’s course.

What Iran Tells Us About UFO Disclosure

When governments confront unknown threats in their airspace, defense budgets surge
and the same aerospace and surveillance companies move hardest. On March 2nd,
Northrop jumped 6% and Lockheed 3.3% on the Iran news — and President Trump has
since ordered the formal release of government UAP files, with the Pentagon confirming
compliance. So if a conventional conflict can move these stocks this fast, what happens
when the bigger story breaks?

See the UFOD holdings: [thetruthisoutthereufod.com

$AMD ( ▲ 1.71% )

AMD had an undercut and rally at the 200 day moving average at the end of March and has just had a crazy move up this month. It’s extended, but the market is telling you something here.

The H.E.A.T. (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2026 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.