Politics × Physics × Disclosure = the best “buy the panic” window in AI infrastructure

Here’s the trade most investors still don’t understand:

AI isn’t constrained by chips anymore… it’s constrained by electrons.
You can order GPUs in quarters. You can stand up shells in quarters. You can sign “demand” in quarters.
But you cannot get utility‑grade power (and the hardware that delivers it) on a quarterly timeline.

That mismatch is the whole story of 2026–2027. And September 2026 is when Wall Street is most likely to misread it—creating a very real “headline dip” in the best names.

This is built around a deceptively simple idea:

That’s why 2026–2027 is the re‑rating window. It’s when “engineering problems” become “earnings problems”… and when the scarcity premium becomes impossible to ignore.

In a power‑constrained world, the line gets longer… the line doesn’t leave.

September is when three cycles collide.

September is 2–3 months before midterms. That’s when campaigns need simple villains and scary narratives:

It doesn’t matter whether the narrative is fair. It matters that it’s headline‑friendly and emotionally viral.

You can fast‑track paperwork… but you can’t fast‑track:

So politics can accelerate approvals, but approvals do not produce electrons.

Late summer / early fall is when the most “legible” evidence tends to become visible:

Now combine that with politics… and you get the perfect storm:

That’s how you get a classic mispricing.

Most investors model the data‑center buildout like software:

But the grid doesn’t work like cloud. The grid works like shipbuilding.

So when the market sees:

That’s the wrong interpretation.

In a constrained system, delays often mean:

Translation: September’s wobble is most likely a timing panic, not a thesis break.

Think about this theme in one sentence:

The winners aren’t the loudest AI storytellers. They’re the firms that can answer two questions when the market freaks out:

Merchant / deregulated power (price-setters when the grid tightens):

Baseload / “firm power” scarcity:

Regulated wires utilities in the path of load growth (rate base growth):

When the bottleneck is years of interconnect + substations + transmission, the contractors become the hidden kings.

This is where the “you can’t conjure electrons” theme becomes literal — the physical kit is the constraint.

If AI racks go denser, cooling and power distribution become the profit pool.

When the grid says “not yet,” the winners are the companies that sell the workaround.

These names win when powered capacity becomes the scarce inventory.

This is the risk-on, higher-volatility subset: companies trying to re-rate powered megawatts from “mining” to “AI infrastructure.”

September’s wobble, if it comes, won’t be random. It will punish the same weak links:

If your advantage is “we can pour concrete fast,” you don’t have an advantage anymore.
Concrete isn’t scarce. Energization is.

If your growth plan depends on one region where approvals become a midterm talking point, you’ve got narrative risk layered on top of physical constraints.

The grid behaves like infrastructure (slow, regulated, equipment‑bound).
Markets punish the companies that pretend otherwise.

If September brings the wobble, here’s the diagnostic test:

If yes, then “slowdown” is likely optics—and the selloff is your entry.

What would have to change for scarcity to stop being scarcity?

Absent those, the trade remains: scarcity reallocates, it doesn’t disappear.

If September delivers the wobble, it’s likely to be the market confusing timing slippage for demand destruction… and that’s exactly when you want to be shopping for power‑secured, execution‑credible names.

1) Data centers are being treated as “AI infrastructure,” not “rate-sensitive real estate.”
Equinix is the cleanest example: it put up strong demand signals (record momentum / bookings language, and a notably better 2026 outlook), and investors are paying up for the scarcity + pricing power that comes with AI-driven capacity constraints.
That’s why you can see data-center / digital infra names catching a bid even when other “real estate” sleeves are getting hit.

2) CBRE (and the real estate services complex) is getting thrown into the “AI eats office” bucket.
The narrative trade is: AI → fewer marginal knowledge-worker seats → less office demand → lower leasing/sales volumes → weaker brokerage/capital markets fee pools. That’s the “AI scare trade” framing that’s been hitting real-estate services names.
What’s notable is the market is willing to sell these stocks even when the quarter itself doesn’t look catastrophic, because the debate is shifting from “near-term earnings” to “terminal demand for office + transaction velocity.” (That’s why you can get violent post-print moves that feel disconnected from the income statement.)

3) Regional banks selling off is the “credit transmission mechanism” of the same story.

When “office” gets repriced lower, investors immediately ask: who funds office? The answer is: banks (and especially smaller/regional balance sheets) plus CMBS/CRE credit.

The “news” (signal):

The “noise” (likely overstated in the very short-term):

It’s possible in pockets, but it’s less likely to be a single systemic “gotcha” and more likely a rolling, idiosyncratic problem:

My checklist to tell “tape fear” from “real CRE event risk” (high signal):

Today’s stock is CrowdStrike (CRWD)…

CRWD is our cybersecurity exposure in MEMY as I believe cyber is an important theme, and CRWD is the best positioned in the group. Looking at a daily chart, it’s taken a beating this year, now trying to pull and undercut and rally at the 10 day moving average and the September lows.

Cybersecurity is moving from “important IT line item” to existential operating requirement because the attack surface is exploding: cloud workloads, remote endpoints, APIs, third‑party integrations, and now AI agents that run continuously and touch systems autonomously. In that world, security spend doesn’t behave like discretionary software—it behaves like insurance plus uptime, because one serious breach can halt revenue, trigger regulatory/legal exposure, and permanently damage customer trust. CrowdStrike is the one I want because it’s positioned as a platform rather than a point product: it sits at the endpoint with a massive sensor footprint, turns telemetry into a data/network effect, and can expand into adjacent modules (identity, cloud, SIEM/next‑gen SOC workflows, exposure management) without forcing customers to stitch together five vendors. If “agents everywhere” becomes the next computing layer, that’s not bearish for security—it’s bullish—and CRWD has the best mix of scale, product velocity, and customer embeddedness to compound as enterprises standardize on fewer, broader security platforms.

Our next webinar…..

Fri, Feb 20, 2PM EST

How to position your portfolio before Washington admits it has non‑human technology, and where the first trillion dollars of “alien alpha” could flow.

You’re not crazy if you believe in UFOs or UAP (unidentified anomalous phenomena). 

In fact, you want to be ready for the day when we’re told, for real, that we’re not alone.

You won’t read about it in the Wall Street Journal or hear about it on CNBC — yet. 

But “Disclosure Day” is coming. 

And the reality of UAP could trigger a shift in global markets that — no hyperbole — makes the Internet boom and the AI explosion seem tiny.

Matt Tuttle, CEO of Tuttle Capital Management ($4 billion AUM), is an ETF rebel who’s spent decades trading big, unexpected market moves.

He created his H.E.A.T. investing framework—Hedges, Edges, Asymmetry, Themes—to turn left-field events into high-conviction opportunities.

Now, he's deploying that exact playbook on the one catalyst almost no one's positioned for...

In a free live “Disclosure Day” briefing, Matt will explain:

✅ Why this isn’t about tinfoil hats. A move from rumor to reality could shift seismic capital across defense, energy, materials, and data – with clear winners and losers.

✅ The “Disclosure Debris:” How small hints can move big money before any big speech from Washington. And why hearings, leaks, and half‑answers already matter more than one big moment if you want a shot at alien alpha.

✅ Early matters – even if you might feel a bit crazy: A simple way to look at UFO news that lets you stay sane, stay skeptical, and still be in position if this really is the next trillion‑dollar theme.

✅ Who could win, who could lose, and when it’s too late: Which sectors of defense, energy, and materials might see money rush in first, and how to think about bet size before everyone on TV is yelling about UFO trades.

✅ The one belief shift that could change how you see every headline about UFOs and tech: The real question isn’t “is this true?” but “what if enough other investors decide it is?”

✅ A 30‑day playbook for the month after confirmation: A practical way to think about reallocating, hedging, and positioning if Washington ever admits more than it already has – without abandoning your own risk limits.

PLUS . . .  you’ll get a free copy of Matt’s Why The UAP Thematic Frontier May Be Closer – And Far Larger – Than You Might Think briefing.

Focus on areas that AI isn’t going to eat……

The H.E.A.T. (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2025 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.