I’ve been a trader and investor for 44 years. I left Wall Street long ago—-once I understood that their obsolete advice is designed to profit them, not you.
Today, my firm manages around $5 billion in ETFs, and I don’t answer to anybody. I tell the truth because trying to fool investors doesn’t help them, or me.
In Daily H.E.A.T. , I show you how to Hedge against disaster, find your Edge, exploit Asymmetric opportunities, and ride major Themes before Wall Street catches on.
Table of Contents
H.E.A.T.
$17.2B IBM Q2 prelim revenue, +1% YoY | $17.86B Street estimate (the miss) | -25.2% IBM close, July 14 — worst one-day drop in company history | $69B Market value erased in the session (WSJ) | ~95% DRAM contract price increase, Q1 2026 QoQ (TrendForce) |
Arvind Krishna did not bury the lede. In a letter to investors released before the bell, he wrote that in the last few weeks of June, clients shifted their quarterly capex toward servers, storage, and memory purchases to secure supply-constrained infrastructure ahead of expected price increases — and that IBM did not anticipate the magnitude of it. That is a Fortune 50 CEO admitting, in writing, that his own sales pipeline was reshuffled by a memory shortage he did not see coming.
The last time a mainframe miss this specific rattled the stock, the story was architecture — open systems eating proprietary hardware, the 1990s unraveling that nearly killed the company before Gerstner's turnaround. This one is not architecture. Z-series and the transaction-processing software stack riding on top of it are not being replaced by a better platform. They are being pushed behind something more urgent. That distinction matters enormously for how long this lasts.
By the closing bell, IBM shares were down 25.2%, erasing $69 billion in market value in a single session — the largest one-day drop in the company's history, surpassing the 23.7% plunge IBM suffered on Black Monday, October 19, 1987. Wall Street has seen IBM take a beating before. It has never seen this.
“IBM did not prove the mainframe is dead. It proved memory inflation can reshuffle enterprise IT budgets faster than management expected.” |
This is not an IBM-is-dead story. It is a memory-tax story.
PART I: THE MECHANICS OF A REPRIORITIZATION
Revenue landed at $17.2 billion, up 1% against a guide north of 5%, and adjusted earnings of $2.93 per share missed the $3.01 FactSet consensus. The shortfall is concentrated exactly where Krishna said it would be: Software grew 5% against expectations running closer to double digits, dragged down by a shortfall in Z-series-linked transaction processing software. Infrastructure fell 7% — worse than the low-single-digit decline IBM had guided to — weighed down by underwhelming demand for the z17, the company's flagship mainframe built for the AI era. Consulting was roughly flat. The one segment still accelerating is Red Hat, up 11% and building sequentially — the open-source, cloud-native side of the portfolio is not seeing the same capex flight as the proprietary mainframe stack.
Financial services and government remain the heaviest historical mainframe buyers, and they haven't stopped needing that infrastructure. But the marginal, GPU-heavy AI buildout is not a Z-series refresh — those budgets live in a different bucket. When memory, server, and AI infrastructure purchases force a choice, a mainframe refresh can often be delayed more safely than a supply-constrained purchase that might cost materially more next quarter.
DRAM contract prices rose roughly 95% quarter over quarter in Q1 2026 and are tracking toward another 58–63% increase in Q2, per TrendForce data, driven by AI and HBM demand pulling supply away from conventional memory. Enterprise buyers watching that curve are not behaving irrationally. They are front-loading server, storage, and memory purchases now, before the next price step, and mainframe refresh timing is one of the more deferrable line items on the list.
Krishna did not hide behind the macro explanation alone. “These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered,” he wrote, adding that IBM had “failed to adapt and move quickly enough” as several major deals slipped past their expected close dates. “These are not excuses, but they are realities.” That is unusually blunt language for a CEO letter, and it cuts directly into the timing-versus-permanent question from Part II: an execution failure is fixable in a way a structural budget shift is not — and Krishna just admitted to some of both.
PART II: TIMING, OR PERMANENT
Here is the question that actually prices this stock, and neither Krishna's letter nor the sell-side has answered it yet: is this a quarter of pull-forward that reverses once cheaper memory inventories clear the channel, or is it the first visible data point of a structural reallocation where mainframe simply loses its claim on the marginal capex dollar going forward?
The bull case for “timing” is straightforward. Capex pulled forward to beat a price increase is, by definition, capex that does not repeat next quarter — it was consumed early. If that is all this is, IBM's guide resets lower for one or two quarters and normalizes as the memory market's own supply response catches up with AI-driven demand.
The bear case for “permanent” is that AI workloads are creating a new default posture inside IT organizations: fund the infrastructure that touches AI first, and treat legacy platforms as a cost center to be trimmed rather than modernized. Categories are lying here in a specific way: “mainframe spend” and “AI spend” look like separate line items on a research note, but inside a single finite IT budget, they are the same pool of dollars competing for priority.
PART III: THE READ-THROUGH NOBODY HAS PRICED YET
IBM's mainframe base is largely insulated from GPU-cluster substitution — Z-series workloads aren't simply migrating to AI accelerators. That is the case for why legacy enterprise hardware franchises have strong underlying footing inside the AI buildout. But footing is not immunity from a capex-timing shock, and the same memory price spike squeezing IBM's Infrastructure segment sits directly upstream of every vendor selling into servers, storage, and memory.
Nobody has published that read-through yet — Dell doesn't report until September, HPE last reported June 1 — which means the market hasn't had a chance to reprice this cohort on IBM's data point. That gap is the trade, and it runs through more than one ticker: Dell, HPE, and Supermicro sit closest to the server demand IBM described; NetApp and Pure Storage are the cleaner storage read-through; Cisco and Arista are one step further removed, benefiting only if the reprioritized budget extends to networking refreshes alongside compute and storage.
The market didn't wait for that read-through to price software — and then it partly walked the reaction back. ServiceNow, Adobe, Workday, SAP, Accenture, and Salesforce all opened down more than 5% in sympathy, before recovering through the session to close lower by a more modest 5.8%, 4.3%, 3.5%, 3.2%, roughly 3%, and 2.1%, respectively. The intraday round trip is itself informative: once investors read past the headline to the detail that IBM's own shortfall was concentrated in z17 mainframe demand — a product line most software companies don't sell into — some of the initial crowding-out fear eased. Meanwhile the software-sector ETF most commonly used to express this trade actually finished the day higher, even as most of its largest constituents fell. A sector label and the sum of its parts can tell two different stories on the same afternoon.
PART IV: WALL STREET'S FIRST VERDICT
Two of the most bearish calls on IBM landed within hours of the warning. One bank cut its rating to the Street's lowest and, unusually, published a substitute: a basket of four proxy stocks constructed to replicate IBM's exposure to quantum computing, enterprise software, consulting, and PC hardware — a basket the firm projects will generate meaningfully higher 2030 earnings power than IBM itself, for a comparable price. A second downgrade made a related point about valuation: IBM's underlying economics increasingly resemble a consulting-and-hardware business, the analysis argued, yet the stock has traded at a software-company multiple — a gap that may not survive a quarter like this one.
FIRM | RATING / ACTION | WHAT IT MEANS |
HSBC | Downgrade to Reduce (from Hold); price target cut to $191 (from $231) | Proposed a “synthetic IBM” basket — 1.19 shares IonQ + 1.22 shares SAP + 0.16 shares Accenture + 0.95 shares HP Inc. — projected to deliver 2030 EPS of $23.15 vs. $16.59 for IBM itself |
BNP Paribas | Underperform; price target $195 | Argues IBM's fundamentals look more like Accenture's — consulting-heavy, mainframe-dependent — than a software company's, while its valuation multiple has traded closer to Microsoft's |
D.A. Davidson | View cited, no rating given | Expects more companies to disclose the same AI-budget-crowding dynamic this earnings season |
Morningstar | View cited, no rating given | Frames the move as capital rotating decisively into hardware; notes mainframes are a structurally distinct hardware category from hyperscaler servers |
Susquehanna | Neutral | Frames the shift as a reallocation of a finite existing tech budget, not incremental new AI spending |
Jefferies | View cited, no rating given | Flags IBM's report as a possible preview ahead of SAP's and ServiceNow's earnings, both due the following week |
WINNERS & LOSERS
COMPANY / SECTOR | VERDICT | WHY IT MATTERS | RISK |
Memory & chip makers (Micron, Sandisk, Intel, Nvidia, AMD, Marvell, Broadcom, Texas Instruments) | TOLLBOOTH WINNER — CONFIRMED SAME-DAY | This is no longer a modeled read-through. Same-day: Sandisk +5.0%, Micron +4.9%, Intel +4.5%, Nvidia +4.1%, Texas Instruments +2.3%, Marvell +2.3%, Seagate +2.1%, Western Digital +1.4%, Broadcom +1.3%; the semiconductor index (SOX) rose 2.5%. | Pricing power reverses hard once supply catches demand; these cycles historically overshoot in both directions |
Dell, HPE, Supermicro | WATCHLIST | Most direct destination for the capex IBM says customers are reprioritizing toward — servers and AI infrastructure. Unconfirmed until their own numbers land. | Dell doesn't report until September, HPE last reported June 1 — no read-through confirmed yet; memory cost inflation also hits their COGS |
NetApp, Pure Storage | WATCHLIST | Cleaner storage-specific read-through than the server names. | Same timing gap — no confirming data yet |
Cisco, Arista | SECONDARY WATCHLIST | Networking benefits only if reprioritized budget extends past compute and storage. One step removed from IBM's specific language. | Weakest link in the read-through chain; easiest to be wrong about |
IBM (Infrastructure & Z-linked software) | PRESSURE | Directly named as the segment losing budget to reprioritization. Mainframe refresh timing is the more deferrable line item under a supply-driven price shock. | If reprioritization proves structural rather than a quarter of pull-forward, this becomes a guide-down story, not a one-quarter miss |
Red Hat (within IBM) | INTERNAL OFFSET | Accelerated to 11%, sequentially up, while the rest of the portfolio decelerated — proof this isn't broad IBM demand destruction. | Sits inside IBM; no clean way to own this offset without also owning the pressure point |
HP Inc. (HPQ) | LOW READ-THROUGH | PC-centric model has limited direct exposure to enterprise server/storage/memory reprioritization. | Component cost inflation (DRAM/NAND) still pressures PC bill-of-materials broadly |
Enterprise software peers (ServiceNow, Adobe, Workday, SAP, Accenture, Salesforce) | SOLD OFF, THEN PARED LOSSES | All six opened down more than 5% in sympathy, then closed lower by a more modest 5.8%, 4.3%, 3.5%, 3.2%, ~2.9%, and 2.1% respectively, as investors read past the headline to IBM's z17-specific shortfall. | The software-sector ETF (IGV) actually rose the same day — a reminder this is a single-stock read-through story, not yet a confirmed sector-wide repricing |
PRESSURE POINTS
PRESSURE POINT | WHAT TO WATCH | TIME HORIZON |
IBM Q2 formal earnings call | Whether management frames this as one-time pull-forward or ongoing reallocation, and whether guidance resets for the back half | July 22, 2026 |
HPE, Dell, Cisco next reports | First chance to see whether reprioritized budget landed as bookings for server/storage/networking vendors | Q3–Q4 2026 |
DRAM contract pricing trajectory | Whether the ~58–63% QoQ Q2 2026 forecast materializes or moderates | Ongoing, quarterly |
Financial services & government IT budget commentary | Any public commentary on capex sequencing from this constituency confirms or denies the “structural” reading | 2026–2027 |
SAP and ServiceNow earnings | First direct test of whether IBM's warning previews broader enterprise software results or was a mainframe-specific event | Week of July 20, 2026 |
IBM's weight in dividend-focused ETFs | Post-selloff dividend yield jumped to ~3.1% from ~2.2%; trailing free cash flow of roughly $13B still covers the ~$6B annual dividend comfortably, but IBM is a top-10 holding in several dividend funds (First Trust Nasdaq Tech Dividend ~8.5%, Invesco DJIA Dividend ~6%, iShares Core Dividend ~5%) that absorbed volatility unrelated to dividend safety | Ongoing — fund flows/rebalancing |
CREDIBILITY FIREWALL
SOURCED/REPORTED | MODELED/INFERRED | EDITORIAL VIEW |
IBM Q2 preliminary revenue $17.2B, +1% YoY, vs. consensus ~$17.86B (IBM Newsroom, Krishna investor letter, July 14, 2026; Reuters, Bloomberg) | Segment growth rates as stated in IBM's letter (Software +5%, Infrastructure -7%, Consulting flat, Red Hat +11%); whether reported or constant-currency isn't specified in the release | The Red Hat/Infrastructure divergence inside one company is the cleanest single data point that this is a capex-timing story, not demand destruction |
Krishna's letter directly attributes the shortfall to clients shifting capex to servers, storage, and memory ahead of expected price increases, stating IBM “did not anticipate the magnitude” | DRAM contract price increases of ~95% QoQ in Q1 2026 and a forecast 58–63% QoQ rise in Q2 2026 (TrendForce) | The magnitude admission from Krishna himself is the tell — this is management saying its own forecasting missed a capex-allocation shift, not analyst speculation |
IBM shares closed down 25.2%, erasing $69 billion in market value — the largest one-day drop in company history, surpassing the 23.7% decline on Black Monday, October 19, 1987; adjusted EPS of $2.93 missed the $3.01 FactSet consensus (Dow Jones Market Data, Barron's, MarketWatch, WSJ, July 14, 2026) | No consensus segment-level estimates were independently confirmed for this draft | The prior draft's premarket-based ~17% figure undershot the eventual close by a wide margin — exactly the kind of gap that's the reason to wait for the settled print before anchoring a stat |
Dell's next report is scheduled for September 2026; HPE last reported June 1, 2026 — no same-day coverage connecting IBM's results to Dell, HPE, Cisco, or HPQ specifically was found | Read-through to Dell/HPE/Supermicro/NetApp/Pure/Cisco as near-term demand beneficiaries is a logical extension of Krishna's stated capex destination, not yet confirmed | The confirmed same-day chip/memory rally strengthens the mechanism, but server OEMs specifically remain an open question until their own numbers land |
Confirmed closing declines: ServiceNow -5.8%, Adobe -4.3%, Workday -3.5%, SAP -3.2%, Accenture ~-2.9%, Salesforce -2.1% — all opened down more than 5% intraday before partly recovering (WSJ, MarketWatch, Barron's, July 14, 2026) | The software-sector ETF (IGV) rose roughly 1.0-1.4% the same day despite most of its largest constituents falling | The intraday round trip and the ETF/constituent divergence both point the same direction: this reads as a single-stock scare that partially unwound once details came out, not a confirmed sector-wide repricing |
Same-day gains confirmed across memory, storage, and chip names: Sandisk +5.0%, Micron +4.9%, Intel +4.5%, Nvidia +4.1%, Marvell +2.3%, Texas Instruments +2.3%, Seagate +2.1%, Western Digital +1.4%, Broadcom +1.3%; the PHLX Semiconductor Index rose 2.5% (MarketWatch, July 14, 2026) | No modeling required here — this is a same-day, sourced market reaction, not a projection | This confirms the tollbooth-winner call from the initial draft same-day rather than as a lagging read-through — the market made this trade before we could publish it |
HSBC downgraded IBM to Reduce (from Hold), cutting its price target to $191 from $231; BNP Paribas rates IBM Underperform with a $195 target (Barron's, July 14, 2026) | HSBC's “synthetic IBM” basket EPS comparison ($23.15 vs. $16.59 projected for 2030) is the firm's own model, not a consensus figure | A sell-side firm publishing a literal replacement basket for a stock it just downgraded is a stronger signal than the downgrade itself — it argues IBM's parts are worth owning separately, not together |
BEAR CASE: WHY THIS COULD BE NOISE
BEAR CASE SPOTLIGHT One bad quarter from a supply-driven price shock is not a franchise thesis. Memory price spikes have historically resolved within several quarters as supply responds, and a capex dollar deferred is not a capex dollar destroyed — a refresh pushed from Q2 to Q4 still shows up as revenue eventually. IBM's own Red Hat and Consulting segments show no comparable deceleration, undercutting the idea that enterprise IT budgets broadly are being slashed rather than sequenced. The biggest risk to the whole thesis is that IBM's miss is deal-timing and sales execution wrapped in a convenient memory-price explanation — and that the Dell/HPE/Supermicro/storage read-through simply doesn't materialize if those customer bases aren't exposed to the same mainframe-specific dynamic. |
FIVE THINGS TO DO WITH THIS INFORMATION
1. Mark July 22 on the calendar. IBM's formal Q2 call is the first real chance to hear whether management frames this as one-time pull-forward or an ongoing reallocation — the language they choose will move the stock more than the numbers already out.
2. Watch Dell, HPE, and Supermicro's next bookings commentary specifically for server/AI-infrastructure order strength, and NetApp/Pure Storage for the storage-specific version of the same signal.
3. Track DRAM contract pricing month to month. The entire reprioritization narrative rests on the price-increase timeline; if pricing moderates faster than the Q2 forecast implies, the “timing, not permanent” case strengthens quickly.
4. Don't treat IBM's Infrastructure weakness as proof the legacy hardware franchise is broken. Mainframe demand hasn't disappeared — it's been sequenced behind a supply-constrained purchase decision, a different and more temporary problem.
5. Resist anchoring on any single stock-decline percentage from July 14. Outlets themselves disagreed same-day; wait for the closing print and the post-earnings-call reaction before sizing a position around this event.
The longest-running theft in American history?
Porter Stansberry's argument: when new money is printed, the dollars you already hold
quietly lose purchasing power, a "theft" you never see on any statement. Whether or not
you agree, the Porter & Company Porter Portfolio Index ETF (PCPP) was built for
investors who'd rather hold a diversified mix than sit in cash. It tracks a rules-based index
split roughly four ways: P&C insurers, capital-efficient equities, hard assets, and
short-term fixed income.
Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal.
Read the prospectus at porterandcofunds.com.
Consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before
investing. This and other information are in the prospectus at PorterandCoFunds.com or (833)759-6110; read it carefully before investing. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. PCPP is new and non-diversified. Distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC.
News vs. Noise: What’s Moving Markets Today
Cooler than expected CPI ignited a rally in tech stocks, particularly in memory….
DRAM pulled an undercut and rally at the 50 day. Of course this morning the memory stocks are selling off, but the broader market is still green.
The QQQs aren’t really going anywhere, but they also had an undercut and rally at the 50 day…..
The news. June CPI looked like victory. It was mostly a refund from cheaper energy. Headline inflation fell 0.4% for the month and slowed to 3.5% year over year. Core inflation was flat for the month and 2.6% over the year. But energy fell 5.7% and gasoline fell 9.7% after the temporary U.S.-Iran ceasefire. That truce has already collapsed. Brent is back near $85.80 and up almost 13% this week. The 2-year Treasury is still around 4.2%, only modestly below Tuesday’s 17-month high near 4.3%. Warsh told Congress one soft report was not “mission accomplished” and said the Fed has “no tolerance for persistently elevated inflation.” Less forward guidance is not a dovish pivot. It means every meeting stays live. (Reuters — June CPI, Reuters — markets, oil and yields, AP — Warsh testimony)
The noise. The noise is that AI either lifts every technology company or the whole thing is a bubble. Today’s evidence says something more brutal. ASML raised its 2026 revenue forecast to €43 billion to €45 billion after quarterly revenue beat estimates, and it plans to expand production capacity by 30% in each of the next two years. IBM fell 25% after warning that customers were diverting spending toward supply-constrained servers, storage, and memory, leaving other technology projects unfunded. AI is working. It is not democratizing profits. It is concentrating them in the companies controlling scarce equipment, memory, and storage. The technology does not need to fail for the average AI trade to disappoint. The spending only needs to migrate away from the companies investors assumed would benefit. (Reuters — ASML results, Reuters — IBM warning)
The dumb advice. The dumb advice comes from J.P. Morgan analysts, who called the CPI report “even better than Goldilocks” and said it should remove fears of a July hike, ease fears about September, and set up a broader market rally. That is a lot of certainty built on one month when gasoline fell because of a ceasefire that no longer exists. Warsh explicitly rejected declaring victory. Brent has gained almost 13% this week. Hormuz traffic recently fell to a two-month low as operators reacted to renewed attacks and safety risks. Goldilocks did not have to price a live energy chokepoint, a divided Fed, and an AI boom that is pushing companies to hoard chips, servers, storage, and memory. One cool print buys time. It does not rewrite the regime. (Reuters — J.P. Morgan’s CPI call, Reuters — Hormuz traffic, AP — Warsh testimony)
Concrete takeaways.
Treat June CPI as relief, not an all-clear.
Watch the 2-year, oil, and actual Hormuz traffic. Ignore ceasefire branding.
Warsh is giving less guidance, not promising easier policy.
Favor AI bottlenecks over broad technology exposure.
Memory, storage, and chip equipment are winning budget share.
ASML validates the buildout. IBM shows who may be paying for it.
Stay short duration until inflation and the front end agree the regime changed.
ETF News
A Stock I’m Watching
This is one I like a while back, remember it’s the only US company that makes the steel that goes into towers. Sold off with everything else after SpaceX but looks like it’s trying to find a bottom.
In Case You Missed It
Great conversation on wide ranging topics with Kenny Polcari…
The H.E.A.T. (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2026 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.