Last week I wrote about three supposedly unrelated themes: The Yen carry trade, oil, and Treasury bonds. Here's what happened last week, in order.

The U.S. Treasury expanded its plan to buy back long-term government debt. The announcement briefly pushed yields lower. By Friday, the 10-year was back near 4.73%, and the 30-year stood near 5.27%.

Two weeks ago, Washington and Tokyo intervened together to support the yen. The dollar now buys about 159 yen — well below its high near 164 before that, but well above where the yen sat right after the intervention.

Brent crude, the global benchmark, closed Friday at $94.39, up more than 6% for the week — its best week in about a month. WTI, the U.S. benchmark, settled at $87.06. Both remain well below the panic highs hit earlier in the war.

These are three markets raising the same question: where does price discovery end and policy support begin?

That's the question behind "The Everything Put?" A policy put is the belief that officials will step in once a market move gets disorderly enough to threaten financing, inflation, or political stability.

To understand what’s going on, first you need to know the why. What does Trump need from a financial policy perspective? He needs lower interest rates, a rising stock market, and lower inflation. What’s the key driver of inflation? Oil prices. Who’s the guy in charge of pulling this off? Scott Bessent. He’s a hedge fund guy who knows all too well how markets work, and how to manipulate them. He also has a couple of key problems:

Bessent has to successfully navigate these issues or we end up with lower stock prices, higher interest rates, and higher inflation——all right before mid term elections.

First, the mechanic — the rest of this issue rests on it.

On Wednesday, Treasury said it would increase the maximum size of its long-bond buybacks from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per round, starting September 9. Seven rounds remain on the schedule through November 4. That's at least $14 billion in extra buying power.

A liquidity backstop is not a guaranteed ceiling on yields. It gives holders of older, less-traded bonds a predictable official outlet — one that can make those bonds easier to trade even while long-term yields keep rising.

Extra is also not guaranteed. Treasury can buy less than the stated maximum if the offers it gets aren't good enough.

Treasury officially calls these liquidity-support operations. In plain terms, it buys older, harder-to-trade bonds from big banks and retires them.

It pays for those bonds by selling more debt somewhere else. That could be short-term bills, other bonds, or a mix. Treasury hasn't said this program is meant to change how long its overall debt runs — only to smooth trading in older bonds.

Here's why it still matters. Duration measures how much a bond's price swings when rates move. A 30-year bond swings hard. A 3-month bill barely moves at all.

That's why a wobble in the 30-year rate draws so much more attention than the same wobble in short-term rates.

This is not the Fed printing money, and it isn't a clean swap of every long bond into short-term debt either. It's a liquidity program, and the market read it as a signal: Treasury is watching closely now that the 30-year rate has flirted with 5.3%.

The buybacks don't fix the deficit — they increase the size of an existing official buyer at the long end, and they show Washington is paying close attention.

Yields are still in an uptrend…..

Japan is the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries. It held roughly $1.12 trillion as of June — about 12% of all foreign-held U.S. debt.

Here's the connection between those two markets. Higher Japanese bond yields give Japanese investors a reason to keep their money at home. A sharp yen rally can also reduce the yen value of unhedged dollar assets, once those holdings are translated back home.

Both forces can push some Japanese money home, which can mean selling Treasuries.

That doesn't mean every Japanese investor sells when the yen moves. It does mean the two markets are tied together.

Washington and Tokyo intervened after the yen approached 164 per dollar. Japan may have spent as much as $58.97 billion buying yen on Thursday and another $36.58 billion during Friday's joint operation.

That makes the widely quoted $95.5 billion figure an estimate of Japan's own two-day spending — not a total combined U.S.-Japan intervention. The U.S. Treasury also sold euros to buy yen; its amount hasn't been disclosed.

The joint statement said the action was meant to counter excessive volatility and disorderly yen moves. Easing imported inflation was also a major Japanese concern.

A plausible secondary U.S. benefit was reducing the risk that Tokyo would need to sell Treasuries to raise dollars. That wasn't disclosed as the intervention's primary objective.

One move can help two markets without being sold as two official goals.

I just came back from Japan so I did appreciate the weaker Yen.

Intervention did initially spike the Yen, but it’s settled and looks to be going back down…..

Oil is different from the other two — it's the unconfirmed piece of this story.

Shipping through the key Middle East chokepoint at the center of this conflict is still badly disrupted. Before the war, that route carried roughly a fifth of the world's oil and gas. Brent still spent most of the summer below the panic highs it hit back in March.

That doesn't require a hidden government seller. Demand forecasts got cut. U.S. crude stockpiles built up fast, even as finished fuel — gasoline, diesel, jet fuel — stayed tight. Alternative pipelines and tanker routes picked up some of the slack, and strategic reserve releases provided temporary relief.

Here's a current receipt on the physical side. Ship-tracking data showed only seven commodity vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday — half the previous day's count. Offers of Iranian crude to Chinese buyers also declined as prices rose.

A futures contract prices a standardized benchmark for one delivery month. Physical cargoes differ by grade, port, and delivery date. A refinery that needs a specific barrel at a specific location next week can end up paying a very different price than the benchmark on the screen.

The physical stress is real. Whether Brent is understating it is a market-structure question. Government suppression is not established.

If the physical premiums on real barrels, shipping, and refining keep climbing while the futures screen stays calm, that's worth watching closely. It may mean the screen price understates how tight fuel supply really is. That's a story about how the market is built — not proof anyone is rigging anything.

Oil does look to be back to an uptrend as well…..

These three markets don't share one operator. They do share one condition.

My read: officials have grown less willing to tolerate disorderly moves in markets this large. Treasury backed liquidity in long bonds. Washington and Tokyo bought yen directly. Oil stays a market-structure story, not a proven intervention.

That lower tolerance can keep a lid on volatility for a while. It can't erase the deficit, close the rate gap with Japan, or fix a broken shipping route.

Policy can bend the path of a price. It can't remove the pressure underneath it. Eventually market forces win. Bessent knows this from his experience with Soros and the British Pound trade.

CME Group Inc. (Nasdaq: CME). CME lists Treasury, currency, and WTI crude futures — the exact tools this issue is built around. A more policy-sensitive market tends to need more hedging, not less. Risk: if these interventions keep working, hedging demand could fade too.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (NYSE: ICE). ICE runs the exchange behind Brent crude futures, the benchmark used throughout this issue. A wider physical-futures gap tends to drive more trading there. Risk: more trading doesn't guarantee higher profit, and an actual fix to the shipping disruption would remove the urgency.

SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE Arca: GLD). Gold isn't getting an announced government price-support program of its own. But it can benefit when policy moves like these weaken confidence in bonds, currencies, or fiscal discipline generally. Spot gold traded near $4,624 late Friday, roughly 17% below its January record. Risk: gold can still fall if real interest rates climb, even during a stretch of fiscal worry like this one.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (Nasdaq: TLT). TLT stays a direct bet on long rates. Treasury's buybacks may ease pressure a bit, but the program is small next to the overall Treasury market, and it doesn't touch the deficit or inflation risk sitting underneath. The price here isn't unreadable — it just has one more buyer in the mix now, alongside every other buyer and seller.

Invesco CurrencyShares Japanese Yen Trust (NYSE Arca: FXY). FXY gives you direct exposure to the yen's value against the dollar. That exchange rate reflects the U.S.-Japan rate gap, inflation, capital flows, and risk appetite — not just official action. Risk: the next government move is one big variable here, not the whole story, and intervention-driven moves can reverse fast.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (NYSE: DAL) and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: UAL). Airlines carry some of the biggest direct fuel-cost exposure in the market. If physical tightness keeps pushing crude prices and jet-fuel margins higher, fuel costs can rise faster than airlines can raise fares. Risk to the bearish view: Delta's Trainer refinery gives it a cushion United doesn't have, and both can pass along some cost through fares and schedules.

We believe market forces always win in the end. So, we still think any type of bond with duration risk is uninvestable (Tbills are ok), you need gold, and you want exposure to real assets. This is all built into our model portfolios, and we have specific ways to play this…..

For more information on our ETF model portfolios you can email Matt Stiller on my team—[email protected]

On bonds. I'm separating the program's actual goal — liquidity — from the broader yield outcome. It can work exactly as designed, making older bonds easier to trade, even while yields stay high. I get more concerned about the broader market if long rates stay near their highs after September 9, especially if Treasury auctions draw weak demand or dealers get stuck holding unusually large shares. That would show the buybacks can't overpower the deficit and inflation pressure underneath — it wouldn't mean the liquidity program itself failed.

On the yen. I get more worried if USD/JPY pushes back above 160 and triggers another intervention — especially another coordinated U.S.-Japan operation. I get less worried if the Bank of Japan materially narrows the rate gap with the Fed and the yen holds steady without more official buying.

On oil. I watch physical premiums, refining margins, and tanker rates against the futures price — not any one alone. If those real-world costs keep climbing while Brent and WTI stay calm, that's the signal that matters. A single-day price jump with no new inventory data behind it proves nothing by itself; oil moves daily on sanctions, shipping, refinery outages, and simple positioning.

One more date to watch: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's press conference Monday is the next scheduled update on Iran sanctions. Reporters may also press him on the buyback program, though that hasn't been announced as part of the agenda.

This month brought two confirmed moves. Treasury backed liquidity for long bonds. Washington and Tokyo bought yen directly.

Oil offered a third, different kind of signal: real-world scarcity can look worse than the futures price without proving anyone is secretly steering it.

These aren't three versions of the same trade. They're three reminders that policy, market structure, and plain supply and demand now shape prices more visibly than they did when rates sat near zero.

Treasury can ease liquidity without fixing the deficit. Governments can buy yen without closing the rate gap behind it. Oil futures can lag real scarcity without being fake.

Policy can bend the path. It cannot erase the pressure underneath it.

Two official actions are facts. Oil remains the market-structure question.

The HEAT (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2026 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.