Pure-play and diversified space companies — satellites, launch services, spacecraft — with options to generate potential income.

 The space economy. Now with potential income.

Learn more: https://www.incomeblastetfs.com/etf/spci

Distributor: Foreside Fund Services

Sign up to learn about a potentially asymmetrical investment opportunity that nobody is talking about……….

On February 19, President Trump started the countdown to potentially the biggest government disclosure in history:

March 19, 2026 2pm EST

Register For My Free Webinar:

Replay will be sent out after the webinar to all registered attendees.

One of the things we spend a lot of time on is thinking about what will be the top themes in the future, especially themes others aren’t thinking of. This could be one of those…..

For 80 years, Japan’s post‑war bargain was simple: build cars, not cannons. The U.S. guaranteed security, Japan focused on growth, and its constitution hard‑coded restraint — Article 9 famously renounces war and the maintenance of “war potential.” But that entire framework is now being stress-tested in real time. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is using her mandate to push Japan toward a far more “normal” great‑power posture — not just higher defense budgets, but the legal plumbing of a modern security state: a CIA‑style foreign intelligence capability, tougher anti‑espionage rules, and a clearer constitutional basis for military power. This isn’t a one‑headline story — it’s a multi‑year regime change with investing implications well beyond “defense stocks up.”

Here’s the part most commentary misses: rewriting a constitution is slow — but building an intelligence + defense-industrial ecosystem is an ongoing spend cycle. Japan’s amendment process requires supermajorities in the Diet and a national referendum, so the constitutional fight itself will be noisy, political, and headline-driven. Meanwhile, the procurement, supply-chain hardening, domestic production incentives, export-rule loosening, and allied interoperability all move forward in parallel — and those are the cash-flow rails. Add in the regional backdrop (China/Taiwan risk, North Korea, and U.S. attention potentially pulled elsewhere) and you get a simple reality: Tokyo is paying for optionality. And in markets, optionality is expensive.

Japan isn’t just buying more missiles — it’s rebuilding capacity: platforms, engines, electronics, ISR (intelligence/surveillance/recon), cyber, satellites, munitions, shipbuilding, and the industrial tooling underneath all of it. That is “HALO” in a different wrapper: physical complexity, long lead times, and government-backed demand.

A CIA/MI6‑style capability isn’t a building with a sign out front. It’s secure comms, encryption, data fusion, satellite and signals intelligence, counterintelligence infrastructure, and operational cybersecurity. Reporting around Japan’s push for a National Intelligence Bureau and stronger intelligence coordination puts this on a defined policy track.
Translation: defense tech and cyber aren’t “nice to have” — they become core budget items.

If Japan moves faster and louder, Beijing doesn’t have to respond with jets — it can respond with export controls, supply-chain friction, and corporate pressure. China has already shown a willingness to restrict exports to Japanese entities tied to security and defense.
That creates a winners/losers map that’s not just “defense up,” but also “China exposure down” in specific areas.

These are the firms with real programs, real factories, and real integration into Japan’s defense complex:

If Japan builds out intelligence and hardens infrastructure, these names get pulled into the spend cycle:

If Japan leans harder into U.S.-aligned defense posture, U.S./European primes that already live in the ecosystem tend to benefit via interoperability, co-development, and regional procurement momentum (think: missiles, air defense, sensors, engines, space/cyber).

The market tends to underestimate how quickly “trade” becomes “national security.” If political tension rises, the pressure often shows up as supply-chain restrictions, export license friction, or informal consumer/contracting headwinds. China has demonstrated it can target Japanese entities tied to defense/security via export restrictions.

That risk can bleed into adjacent industrial supply chains even when the target list is “narrow.”

A meaningful defense/intelligence ramp isn’t free. Even if it’s politically popular, the bond market can still force discipline — and if yields rise, long-duration equities and highly levered balance sheets tend to be the first to feel it.

Any business model that implicitly relies on a low-tension, ultra-globalized Asia trade regime becomes more fragile at the margin — especially where there’s concentrated single-region exposure.

This isn’t about whether Japan becomes “militaristic.” It’s about something much more investable:

Japan is rebuilding the hardware and institutions of sovereign power — and that creates a long runway for capex, systems integration, secure networks, and defense production.

The headline will be constitutional politics. The money will flow through procurement, intelligence buildout, industrial policy, and allied interoperability. And the risk will show up in China retaliation channels and the bond market’s tolerance for fiscal expansion.

Nice up day in the market, but in the whole scheme of things it didn’t really change anything…..

SPY is so close to it’s 200 day moving average you would expect it to at least test that area.

The news of the day was Jensen’s Huang’s speech at GTC, the market came off the highs afterwards, so seemingly it wasn’t impressed.

Jensen Huang’s “$1 trillion through 2027” line at GTC was classic Nvidia storytelling — a big, round-number headline that can move the stock intraday, but it’s not the same thing as formal guidance (and the market knows it, which is why the pop faded). The news isn’t the quote — it’s the implication: Nvidia just raised the expectation bar again at a moment when hyperscaler capex and free-cash-flow scrutiny are already the market’s pressure point. Until the CFO frames what “$1T” actually means (timing, assumptions, mix, and customer spend durability), treat the trillion-dollar tease as noise and focus on the real scoreboard: backlog conversion, customer capex trajectories, and whether demand holds up when the buildout shifts from “training everything” to “running everything” (inference + agents) without blowing up power budgets and balance sheets.

KLA (KLAC) is our favorite way to stay long the AI semiconductor buildout without living or dying on the copper vs. optics debate. No matter where the “copper-to-optics” boundary ultimately lands, the common denominator is more complexity, more layers, tighter tolerances, and higher-value chips—which drives structurally higher inspection/measurement intensity across advanced logic, advanced packaging, and HBM. At its Analyst Day, KLAC leaned into that message by raising its CY26 growth outlook to the high-teens, reiterating a multi-year framework that implies a ~15% revenue CAGR through 2030 (to ~$26B) and ~$84 of EPS, while also returning capital aggressively via a $7B buyback (plus a higher dividend). In short: if you want an “AI picks-and-shovels” compounder that benefits from the manufacturing arms race itself—not just a single architecture outcome—KLAC is one of the cleanest expressions.

We own KLAC in UFOD

The H.E.A.T. (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2026 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.