Stablecoins 2.0: The Infrastructure Race

As I’ve continued to say, I am paying attention to what Trump tweets about markets. As long as he is bullish, I’m bullish, and I think tariff issues are more Art of the Deal at this point…..

Then you have the Fed….

The Federal Reserve is entering a period of heightened uncertainty, marked by internal divisions, external political pressure, and an increasingly fragile macroeconomic backdrop. The latest FOMC minutes reveal a growing divergence of views on how to respond to tariff-driven inflation risks, with some members already signalling support for rate cuts. While Chair Powell remains focused on preserving the Fed’s inflation-fighting credibility, his leadership is being tested both externally — by Trump’s public attacks and calls for a ā€œshadow chairā€ — and internally, as FOMC members appear to be repositioning ahead of a potential change in leadership. This behavioural shift risks undermining consensus and weakening the Fed’s signalling power. The politicisation of monetary policy echoes historical episodes like Nixon-Burns, raising concerns about the erosion of Fed independence. With Powell’s term ending in 2026 and succession speculation intensifying, the institution faces a structural test: whether it can maintain its technocratic integrity amid rising populist pressure. Markets, meanwhile, are increasingly pricing in rate cuts based on political signalling rather than economic fundamentals — a dynamic that could distort expectations and complicate policy execution. The battle for the Fed’s soul is no longer theoretical; it is unfolding in real time, with implications for inflation, employment, and the credibility of U.S. monetary governance.

Jef-X (Daily Macro)

I would not bet against Trump getting what he wants.

Of course nobody has any idea on whether Bitcoin will lose steam here or not…..

So far all the bears are looking pretty dumb…..

Long time readers know I don’t like regional banks…..

Below we take deep dives on stablecoins, P&C companies, and healthcare. Stablecoins are a theme that I think will continue to get bigger, P&C is something I think you should have exposure to for diversification, and the healthcare names are just one of those transitory opportunities that sometimes pop up after a major selloff…….

šŸ”„ HEAT Formula Playbook: Themes-Stablecoins

Stablecoins are one of the most interesting new themes. I recently went into Fiserv (FI) and noticed that B Riley upgraded them yesterday….

Fiserv, Inc. (FI - $170.42, Buy; $249.00 PT); Company Update - Hal Goetsch; [email protected]; 617-951-6995

• We believe FI is better positioned to monetize stablecoin adoption than most investors realize.

• Stablecoin players need to get into payments, but companies like FI are already there. We see stablecoins as just another acceptance method that FI will bring into its already vast global payment and fintech capabilities.

• FI's network and regulatory infrastructure is far harder to replicate with 10,000 bank connections, 6M merchants and 1.7B customer accounts.

• FI was left behind in the recent rally. Shares are trading at only 17.0x and 14.6x our 2025/2026 estimates, respectively. We see significant upside to our $249 PT from current levels.

So I had GPT take another deep dive into the industry for potential winners and losers…..

Here's a fully integrated breakdown of stablecoin infrastructure plays—including Fiserv (FI) and peers like Circle (CRCL), Coinbase (COIN), PayPal (PYPL), Visa (V), Mastercard (MA), and others. The focus is on publicly investable names (or likely-to-be), filtered for asymmetric upside, stablecoin yield monetization, and regulatory readiness.

🧱 Stablecoins 2.0: The Infrastructure Race

As stablecoins transition from crypto-novelty to fiat-on-chain payment rails, the winners won’t just be token issuers—they’ll be the rails, APIs, and clearing layers that integrate dollars-on-chain into traditional finance.

🧠 The Big 5 Investable Stablecoin Infrastructure Plays

Company

Role in Ecosystem

Core Thesis

Rating (1–10)

Fiserv (FI)

Payments Processor / Bank Enabler

FIUSD, Paxos/Circle partners, 6M merchants + 10K banks—building tokenized fiat plumbing for U.S. banking.

9.5

Circle (CRCL)

Issuer (USDC)

IPO candidate. Runs the second-largest stablecoin w/ $30B+ in circulation; will benefit from public listing, but less B2B moat than FI.

9.0

Coinbase (COIN)

Wallet + Exchange + Custodian

BlackRock/USDC partner, beneficiary of reserve revenue, issuer of Base L2 blockchain. Gateway to stablecoin yield.

8.5

PayPal (PYPL)

Consumer Payments + Stablecoin Issuer (PYUSD)

Own stablecoin + built-in checkout base. Focused on retail, but limited bank integration. Token gaining traction with Solana and MetaMask.

8.0

Visa / Mastercard (V / MA)

Network Layer

Running pilots with Circle, Solana, Fireblocks; moving toward stablecoin clearing + cross-border settlement. Already embedded in wallets.

7.5

šŸ” Strategic Comparison Table

Metric

Fiserv

Circle

Coinbase

PayPal

Visa / MA

Stablecoin Role

Acceptance & settlement infrastructure

Issuer & protocol-layer

Exchange, reserve holder, partner

Issuer, consumer interface

Pilots, clearing tech

Revenue Source

Interchange + payment network fees

Float yield, issuance volume

Float yield, trading fees

Float yield + ecosystem monetization

Clearing + FX replacement

Regulatory Position

10,000 bank ties, AML/KYC gold standard

Strong compliance focus, regulator-approved reserves

SEC-exposed; known target

Limited float disclosure

Still in pilot phase, waiting for final rule clarity

Moat

Merchant + banking network

First-mover in compliant stablecoins

Custody + wallet scale

Brand + user base

Network integration

Investor Access

Public (FI)

Private IPO (soon)

Public (COIN)

Public (PYPL)

Public (V / MA)

šŸ”„ Optional Plays (Lower Liquidity or Riskier)

Ticker

Name

Comment

Rating

SRPL

Ripple (XRP)

Tokenized cross-border payment layer, exploring stablecoin-like FX tokens

5.5

USDT

Tether (private)

Largest stablecoin, opaque reserves, no public vehicle

4.5

AVGO / NVDA

Infrastructure

Indirect but critical to stablecoin compute (signing, settlement)

7.0

HOOD

Robinhood

Just launched tokenized equities, building stablecoin-native wallet

6.5

🧭 Investment Takeaways

  1. Core Portfolio

    • Fiserv (FI): Best risk/reward profile, especially after lagging recent fintech rally.

    • Coinbase (COIN): Benefiting from float yield + chain monetization + regulated custody.

    • Circle (CRCL): Pre-IPO accumulation if available, or via PIPE/post-listing.

  2. Supplemental

    • Visa / Mastercard: Long-term plays on clearing evolution; slower monetization path.

    • PayPal: Retail-focused, moderate exposure. Best paired with FI or COIN.

  3. Watchlist / Optionality

    • HOOD, Ripple, Avalanche-based plays (via ETFs) for risk-adjusted tokenization trades.

🧠 Bottom Line

ā€œThe stablecoin race isn’t just about tokens—it’s about who controls the rails, not the coins. Fiserv may be building the Swift of Stablecoins, while COIN and Circle mint the money and Visa clears the lanes.ā€

šŸ”„ HEAT Formula Playbook: Themes-Property & Casualty Insurers

I am a big believer in the diversification benefit of adding property & casualty insurers to your portfolio. If you look back over the past five years the Invesco KBW Property and Casualty ETF has a .542 weekly correlation to the SPY ETF and a .046 correlation to the AGG ETF (according to Bloomberg). So this tweet caught my attention, P&C companies are having a rough month, so I wondered whether this was good news, bad news, or no news. I had GPT take a deep dive…..

🧠 What This Means for Property & Casualty Insurers

šŸ‘ Good News

  1. Underwriting Margin Relief

    • Higher premiums help carriers remedy elevated loss ratios, especially after recent years of severe catastrophe losses .

    • Insurers can better charge ā€œtrue riskā€ prices, strengthening future profitability.

  2. Improved Rate Adequacy

    • Across most U.S. states, rate filings are aligning closer to actual expected loss trends, reducing risk of underpricing or reserve depletion

  3. Selective Market Withdrawal = Less Competition

    • Insurers exiting high-risk markets (e.g., Louisiana, Florida) reduce supply, allowing remaining carriers to increase prices and margins

āš ļø Mixed / Challenging

  1. Affordability & Premium Elasticity

    • Dramatic increases (e.g., $14,000/yr in Louisiana) may exceed consumer tolerance, leading to non-renewals, policy cancellations, or demand for state-backed plans .

  2. Regulatory & Political Pushback

    • Some states might impose rate caps or stricter justifications (e.g., Florida, California), limiting how aggressively insurers can price .

  3. Rising Loss Severity from Climate

    • Even with higher premiums, carriers face persistent or increasing catastrophe losses, suggesting underwriting gains won’t be guaranteed .

šŸ† Potential Winners in the P&C Landscape

  1. Large, Diversified P&C Carriers

    • Chubb (CB), Travelers (TRV), AIG (AIG): Strong capital buffers and ability to selectively withdraw from unprofitable zones while increasing margins elsewhere.

  2. Reinsurance and NatCat Specialists

    • MMC (Marsh & McLennan), AON (AON), Brokers like WLTW (Willis Towers Watson) gain from surging treaty prices and renewed risk-layer pricing.

  3. Regional Carriers with Niche Focus

    • HCI Group (HCI) in Florida, Amerisafe (AMSE) selectively raising rates in hard-hit states.

    • Others stepping into vacated markets as ā€underwriting specialistsā€.

šŸ’” Notable Risks & Watch-Outs

  • State-backed insurers (e.g., Florida Citizens, California FAIR Plan) may absorb displaced customers, reducing private carrier exposure.

  • Mortgage delinquencies and housing market volatility—exacerbated by rising insurance costs—can lead to policyholder churn .

  • Continued severe weather could overwhelm rate increases, trapping insurers in loss cycles.

šŸ”¢ Summary Table

Theme / Factor

Impact on P&C Insurers

Premium Increases (8–27%)

āœ… Boost underwriting margins

Policyholder Dropouts

āš ļø Possible loss of customers and volume

Regulatory Scrutiny

āš ļø Limits to rate hikes

Climate Loss Tailwinds

āš ļø Persistent high losses even with better pricing

Industry Shakeout

āœ… Survivors gain pricing power; brokers gain from reinsurance resets

šŸŽÆ Investment Takeaways

  • Overweight:

    • Chubb (CB): Global footprint, strong capital structure, best-in-class nat cat underwriting.

    • Travelers (TRV): Balanced portfolio, rate momentum, data-driven underwriting.

  • Select Regional Plays:

    • HCI Group in Florida — agile, regionally focused pricing strategy.

  • Reinsurance Brokers:

    • MMC / AON — benefit from broader rate normalization and client demand.

🧠 Bottom Line

Rising home insurance prices are a double-edged sword. They help insurers recalibrate pricing to meet increased risk but simultaneously stress affordability, especially in disaster-prone states. Well-capitalized, diversified carriers with strong underwriting discipline stand to profit significantly, while exposed or overly concentrated players could struggle.

UBS also came out with a note on P&C yesterday…..

Here's a consolidated, institutional-grade view of the P&C insurance sector, integrating UBS’s 2Q25 call with earlier analysis (Insurify home insurance inflation data, climate trends) and pointing to clear portfolio actions.

🧠 UBS View (July 9, 2025):

ā€œFavor Personal Lines, Cautious on Commercial, Brokers Attractive Post-Printā€

šŸ” Key Points:

  • P&C stocks -4% in Q2, underperforming both S&P Financials (+5%) and the S&P 500 (+11%)

  • Rotation out of ā€œdefensivesā€ like insurance → into banks and rate-sensitive cyclicals

  • Valuation:

    • P&C carriers now trade below 10-year average P/E

    • Insurance brokers trading at a 5% premium to historical averages, but still well below peak relative multiples

  • Tactical call:

    • Buy personal lines (e.g., ALL) into Q2

    • Wait on commercial lines

    • Own brokers post-earnings for operating leverage

🧭 Integrated View: What’s the Setup for P&C Now?

Theme

Implication for P&C Insurers

Home Insurance +8–27% YoY

Bullish for personal lines (e.g., ALL, TRV) — pricing power returns

Climate-driven NatCat risk

Favors sophisticated underwriters (CB, TRV) and brokers (MMC, AON)

Commercial pricing pressure

Bearish near term for names like WRB, CNA as loss trends outpace renewals

Valuation Reversion

Carriers = discounted; brokers = modest premium but room to expand

Rate environment stabilizing

May limit investment income upside for insurers, benefits brokers via volume

šŸ”„ Stock-Level Ratings (1–10)

🟢 Personal Lines Winners (Buy into Q2)

Ticker

Name

UBS View

Our View

Rationale

ALL

Allstate

Favorite

9.0

Best pure-play on personal lines premium acceleration (auto + homeowners); strong Q2 setup

TRV

Travelers

Neutral

8.0

Well-balanced portfolio; benefits from stable pricing and high ROE in both personal and small biz

CB

Chubb

Neutral

8.5

Global footprint + disciplined underwriting = quality compounder. Leverage to personal + specialty

🟔 Commercial Lines (Wait & See)

Ticker

Name

UBS View

Our View

Rationale

WRB

W.R. Berkley

Cautious

6.5

Strong long-term operator but near-term margin compression risk from reinsurance and competitive pricing

CNA

CNA Financial

Cautious

6.0

Weaker reserve adequacy vs. peers; lacks upside catalysts in H2

🟢 Brokers (Buy Post-Print)

Ticker

Name

UBS View

Our View

Rationale

MMC

Marsh McLennan

Attractive

8.5

Steady margin expansion, strong advisory & reinsurance growth; capital-light model shines post-Q2

AON

Aon

Attractive

8.0

More global volatility exposure but favorable rate cycle and cross-sell support EPS growth

WLTW

Willis Towers

Attractive

7.5

Improving earnings visibility, but less margin leverage than peers

šŸ’” Strategy Summary

šŸ“ˆ 1. Own Personal Lines Into Q2 Earnings

  • Allstate (ALL) is the cleanest expression of the home insurance repricing trade, with the sharpest YoY increase in premiums already approved in key states (CA, FL, TX).

  • Travelers (TRV) and Chubb (CB) also benefit from better rate capture, particularly in auto + umbrella.

šŸ’° 2. Post-Q2, Rotate Into Brokers

  • MMC and AON are positioned to outperform on pricing volume and deferred earnings momentum. They monetize market volatility and insurance rate dispersion, not just claims.

šŸ•“ 3. Hold Off on Commercial Lines

  • Near-term margin headwinds from reinsurance, wage inflation, and loss costs (esp. liability + property) may not show recovery until Q4 or 2026 renewals.

šŸ“Œ Final Takeaway

"UBS is right to say the P&C trade has bifurcated—homeowners are back, commercial is muddling through, and brokers are the long-term alpha generators. This is an allocate-by-subsegment moment, not a sector beta bet."

šŸ”„ HEAT Formula Playbook: Themes-Healthcare Providers and Payors

Healthcare payers and providers are usually not that interesting to me, but what’s going on with UNH and CNC has put this area into play. I run a weekly RSI strategy to buy stocks that have gotten hit, and through that I am now in CNC, ELV, and MOH, so when I saw Cantor came out with a report on the area I had GPT take a deep dive…..

šŸŽÆ Core Thesis from Cantor: Providers > Payors into 2Q25

Cantor’s analyst Sarah James highlights a constructive near-term setup for providers over payors, but names ELV, MOH, and CNC as high-conviction rebound trades among the payor group, particularly after recent weakness and guidance resets.

šŸ” Deep Dive: Your Current Holdings

šŸ”µ ELV (Elevance Health)

Cantor View: Better positioned than UNH, but investor fears remain elevated due to adverse selection and Medicaid pressure.

  • Investor fear: MA (Medicare Advantage) adverse selection risk due to 12% enrollment growth.

  • Cantor disagrees: Believes risk is materially lower than UNH, and ELV has cleaner exposure.

  • Guidance:

    • ELV guided 1H25 EPS to be 60% of FY, which aligns with Cantor's $8.77 estimate (but below Street’s $9.16).

    • Buy-side expectations appear met, Street expectations still too high—setting up potential beat.

āœ… Take: ELV looks like a classic asymmetric sentiment overreaction. The stock’s underperformance vs. peers doesn’t reflect its relatively stronger underwriting and cleaner MA book.

Rating: 8.5/10 — Attractive rebound setup, especially if Street revises expectations downward and ELV clears a low bar.

šŸ”µ MOH (Molina Healthcare)

Cantor View: Mixed. Revised after 2Q25 and FY guidance update due to cost trend acceleration across all lines: Medicaid, MA, and exchanges.

  • Medicaid: Cited increasing cost pressures mid-quarter.

  • MA: Noted headwinds but not as deep as UNH.

  • Guidance: Likely de-risked now, after reset.

🟔 Take: MOH has historically been a margin execution machine, but cost creep in 3 channels simultaneously is rare. Could be a bounce trade, but not best-in-class near-term.

Rating: 6.5/10 — Ownable on dip, but macro health cost trends make it a less durable long unless visibility improves.

šŸ”µ CNC (Centene)

Cantor View: Recently withdrew 2025 guidance—spooked market short term, but updated commentary suggests MA and PDP (Part D) developing better than expected.

  • Marketplace line: Still under pressure.

  • MA: Improving vs. prior tone.

  • Cost pressure: Exists, but not systemic.

🟢 Take: Guidance withdrawal means CNC likely sandbagged future quarters. The company is seeing improving momentum in PDP and MA—the most sentiment-sensitive segments.

Rating: 7.5/10 — Now derisked and likely to surprise positively. A solid tactical long.

šŸ’” Other Stocks Worth Watching (Based on Cantor Report)

šŸ”¶ HCA (HCA Healthcare) — Cantor Favorite on Provider Side

  • Set up for a beat and raise.

  • TN DPP benefit + hurricane recovery = revenue tailwind.

  • Pricing and volume assumptions conservative.

Rating: 8.5/10 — Attractive in your framework; levered to macro recovery, not just medical trend stability.

šŸ”¶ THC (Tenet Healthcare)

  • Positive setup from acuity mix and 2.9% adjusted admissions growth.

  • Benefits from TN DPP and limited Texas flood exposure.

Rating: 8.0/10 — Good tactical exposure to provider upside; favorable intra-quarter momentum.

šŸ”· UNH (UnitedHealth)

  • Returning CEO Steve Hemsley cleaning up Optum.

  • Guidance likely conservative now (~$19–20 EPS vs. Street at $22).

  • MA & supplemental benefits to be scaled back.

Rating: 8.0/10 — High quality, but not quite washed out yet; ideal post-reset trade if Q2 delivers a beat and modest raise.

šŸ“ˆ Final Rankings (1–10 Scale | Investment Potential from Current Levels)

Ticker

Rating

Commentary

ELV

8.5

Beatable setup, better fundamentals than sentiment implies

HCA

8.5

Best pure provider play — TN DPP kicker and solid volumes

THC

8.0

Mid-cap provider bounce setup with favorable survey data

UNH

8.0

Undervalued turnaround, but not yet fully reset

CNC

7.5

Likely sandbagged; MA and PDP lines improving

MOH

6.5

Solid operator but facing too many headwinds at once

🧠 Strategy Summary

  • You’ve bought the right names at the right time, as all three (ELV, MOH, CNC) have seen:

    • Fundamental resets

    • Underperformance vs. peers

    • Setup for sentiment reversal if Q2 prints beat sandbagged estimates

  • Pair these with HCA or THC for exposure to the ā€œprovider reboundā€ trade, which Cantor sees as more attractive than payors heading into 2H25.

Before You Go Some Ways I Can Help

  1. ETFs: The Antidote to Wall Street

  2. Inside HEAT: Our Monthly Live Call on What Wall Street Doesn’t Want You To Know

  3. Financial HEAT Podcast https://www.youtube.com/@TuttleCap Freedom from the Wall Street Hypocrisy

  4. Tuttle Wealth Management: Your Wealth Unshackled

  5. Advanced HEAT Insights: Matt’s Inner Circle, Your Financial Edge

    The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.Ā© 2025 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.