For the last two years, “AI” has been a GPU story. That was the easy narrative: buy the shovel-maker (chips), sell the hype. But markets are waking up to a less sexy truth: the next bottleneck isn’t compute… it’s memory. And when memory tightens, it doesn’t just hit data centers—it taxes the entire electronics economy from servers to smartphones to cars.

Here’s the key setup: HBM is pulling the whole supply chain upward like a vacuum. The AI stack doesn’t just need GPUs—it needs insane memory bandwidth (HBM), more conventional DRAM (DDR5), and more storage (enterprise SSD/NAND) to feed, cache, and serve models at scale. When the highest-value customer (hyperscalers + “Mag 7” supply chains) shows up and says “name your price,” everyone else gets rationed.

A supplier update we received paints a market that’s rapidly shifting from “tight” to “allocation.” This isn’t a gentle upcycle—this is the kind of pricing action you see when the industry is forced to prioritize the highest-margin demand first:

DRAM (DDR4/DDR5)

NAND / Flash

None of this should surprise you if you zoom out. Memory is the easiest “hidden” constraint to underestimate because it looks like a commodity… right up until it becomes scarce. Then it behaves like a toll booth.

This is the core takeaway:

When memory prices rip, it’s a profit transfer.

And unlike a pure GPU story, memory inflation bleeds into everything:

So if the market is rotating toward “real economics” and away from “AI vibes,” memory is one of the cleanest bridges between the two: it’s AI demand, expressed through old-fashioned scarcity + pricing power.

✅ WINNERS (Memory inflation = pricing power + leverage)

❌ LOSERS (Memory becomes an input-cost shock)

If you want one simple dashboard for whether this theme keeps running:

Memory is cyclical. The bear case is always: “They overbuild, pricing collapses.” That can happen. But the difference in this cycle is that HBM isn’t just another SKU—it’s becoming strategic infrastructure for AI. If AI capex persists, memory doesn’t need a perfect economy to stay tight.

Noise: “Tech is breaking.”
Signal: The market isn’t dumping tech… it’s repricing who gets paid in an AI-first economy.

Here’s what actually happened under the surface: software got hit again because the market is increasingly treating “AI agents” as a direct tax on seat-based SaaS pricing power. Microsoft didn’t “miss” in the traditional sense — it reinforced the fear. Azure growth was fine, but the CapEx bill was louder than the monetization proof, and the message investors heard was: we’re still spending like a utility while returns are still being argued in PowerPoint. Meanwhile, Meta showed the cleanest version of the opposite story: AI is already paying for itself in the ad engine (better targeting, better conversion, more demand, higher prices per ad). Same capex arms race… totally different scoreboard. That’s why the whole software complex caught stray bullets: the market is asking, “If the biggest platforms can’t clearly show ROI yet, what happens to the weaker, ‘AI veneer’ layer?”

Now zoom out: semis still win on relative strength, but we’re reaching “crowding” levels that punish even correct theses. Memory has gone parabolic — and parabolic is always fun… until it isn’t. When the MS Global Memory Basket is ~123% above its 200DMA and Micron is ~150% above its 200DMA (more stretched than any point in history, including dot-com), you’re no longer debating fundamentals — you’re debating positioning gravity. That doesn’t mean the memory story is over. It means the next phase becomes risk management, not cheerleading.

And then there’s the part that confused everyone yesterday and so far today: precious metals sold off hard at the same time equities were wobbly. That looks “wrong” only if you assume gold trades purely as a fear gauge (hint: it doesn’t). In reality, gold has become a crowded positioning vehicle, and when investors de-gross, crowded longs get hit first — even if the macro case is still intact. In other words: today looks like position unwinds, not a thesis break. If your longer-term view is “USD diversification + geopolitical premium + policy volatility = structural bid for hard assets,” then a sharp flush is often how you get paid to add, not a reason to panic-sell.

The quiet tell: despite the carnage in parts of tech, NYSE breadth stayed positive — this wasn’t a classic “get me out of everything” day. And IWM vs QQQ pulling back to support looks more like a reset than a failure.

We’ve been dead on about a lot of themes and names recently, software isn’t one of them. I still have hope though……

ServiceNow (NOW) — NOW just reminded the market why “good” isn’t always good enough in this tape: results were solid with cRPO growth still running around the ~20% organic (cc) range, but the beat looked more muted than last quarter and the forward guide implies a gradual step-down (with commentary pointing toward ~high-teens organic cRPO as you move through the first half). That’s the key tension: the business is still executing, but investors are currently rewarding acceleration (or at least a clear path to it), and software sentiment remains fragile. Management’s response—leaning into a larger repurchase program (including an ASR) and signaling no near-term blockbuster deals—reads like a “we’ll compound and buy stock here” posture rather than a “we’re about to re-accelerate tomorrow” posture. For the next leg up, I’m watching whether NOW can (1) re-expand cRPO upside vs guide, (2) show improving net-new intensity without relying on early renewals, and (3) provide tangible evidence that AI / workflow automation is additive (not just a feature) and translates into bigger deal sizes and higher attach. If those datapoints turn, the stock can rerate quickly—but until then, this is a high-quality operator that may need a sentiment catalyst more than a fundamentals catalyst.

The H.E.A.T. (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2025 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.