How to capture growth AND income in 2026’s surging orbital economy. April 16th, 2026, 2PM ET. Click Here to register

THE GOSPEL

For thirty years, the West treated defense like a legacy subscription. Cut the budget. Stretch the replacement cycle. Keep the flagship platforms. Assume the stockpiles would be there if they were ever needed.

Then Ukraine happened — and NATO learned the truth the hard way.

Modern war doesn't just burn money. It burns inventory. And the West's inventory was built for peacetime.

Shells that were supposed to last years disappeared in weeks. Precision weapons that were marketed as decisive turned out to be finite. Production lines that were supposed to surge when called upon — couldn't. You cannot restart a factory in six months. You cannot train a propellant chemist in a quarter. The industrial base that was supposed to underpin deterrence had been quietly hollowed out across three decades of peace dividend thinking.

The reckoning is now structural and political. All 32 NATO members are formally committed to spending 2% of GDP on defense — many pushing toward 3%. Germany passed a constitutional amendment to exempt defense spending from its debt brake, something that hadn't happened in the post-war era. Poland is the largest ground-force modernizer in Europe. The EU launched a defense industrial fund of historic scale. The political signal is unmistakable and durable: the arsenal has to be rebuilt, and the checks have already been written.

"The side that runs out of shells first loses. NATO learned that watching Ukraine — and it cannot un-know it."

THE CRACK IN THE GOSPEL

Here is what the consensus gets wrong about the rearmament trade: they think it is about the big primes. They look at the major fighter programs, the bombers, the carriers — and they think they have found the trade. They have not.

The biggest contractors will get business. They always do. But the most durable demand curves in this cycle are not in exquisite platforms. They are in three bottlenecks that nobody talks about — because they are not as photogenic as a stealth aircraft.

Meanwhile, the major platform programs carry real execution risk. Delivery and margin volatility on large fixed-price contracts have become a feature, not a bug, of the legacy prime landscape. The companies with fixed-price pain and program overruns are exactly the ones making headlines — and exactly where the market's excitement is most misplaced.

The crack in the conventional defense investment thesis is that investors are buying the contractors with the most famous names, not the ones with the most durable demand curves.

THE MECHANISM

The investment playbook is built around three bottlenecks. Each one has structural demand that exists regardless of which platform program wins the next competition.

Bottleneck 1: Munitions Throughput

This is the part everyone talks about — and still underestimates. In a high-tempo conflict, deterrence is measured in how many interceptors you can produce per month, not how many you can demo at an air show. Artillery shells, air defense interceptors, missiles, drones, counter-drone systems — these are the true consumables of the modern battlefield. And the uncomfortable truth: you cannot rebuild throughput overnight. Factories, tooling, certifications, energetic materials, and skilled labor represent a multi-year process even when the checks clear. The companies already running at capacity with years of backlog are the beneficiaries. Their constraint is not demand — it is production.

Bottleneck 2: Electronics and Communications

The next peer-level conflict is not a tank duel. It is an electronic and spectrum war. Every NATO country can buy hardware. What most of them do not yet have is: secure tactical radios that work under sustained jamming, modern electronic warfare suites, sensors that survive a contested environment, and embedded computing that can fuse data fast enough to matter. The refresh mandate here is not optional — it is existential. And the demand curve is independent of oil prices, election cycles, or which platform gets the cover of Aviation Week.

Bottleneck 3: Interoperability Software

NATO's real weakness is not courage — it is integration. Thirty-two militaries run different systems, different data standards, different operating pictures. In a real crisis, the side that wins is the side that can see, decide, and act faster than the enemy. That is not a hardware problem. It is a battle-management, sensor-fusion, and command-and-control problem. Software does not replace hardware here — it makes hardware usable.

SPOTLIGHT: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES (PLTR)

Palantir is the operating system of the allied military. Its Maven Smart System is live with the U.S. Army. Its battlefield AI platform is being evaluated across NATO allies. The market still reads it as a surveillance company — a misread worth money. Every NATO military needs interoperability. Thirty-two different command structures, data formats, and kill chains have to be fused into one decision loop. That is not a hardware problem. It is a software problem. And right now, Palantir is the only company at scale that has built it.

WINNERS

PRESSURE POINTS

Risk here is margin timing and execution, not business failure. The structural demand floor is intact.

WHAT WOULD BREAK THIS THESIS

A durable Russia-Ukraine ceasefire that meaningfully reduces European threat perception could slow parliamentary approvals. A hard fiscal shock in the U.S. — sequestration, debt-ceiling drama, reconciliation failure — would delay procurement cycles. And the most structurally interesting bear case: precision low-cost munitions could erode the premium pricing of legacy platforms over time, rewarding the electronics and software layer at the expense of exquisite hardware. The strongest positions in this trade are in consumables, comms, sensors, and software — not platform primes. Size accordingly.

FIVE KEY TAKEAWAYS

1.    Modern war doesn't burn money — it burns inventory. The lesson of Ukraine is that the side that runs out of shells first loses. Deterrence is now measured in throughput, not just capability.

2.    Europe is the most underowned trade. The ground-force modernization happening in Germany, Poland, and the Nordics represents generational capex. Most U.S. investors are still dramatically underweight European defense equities.

3.    Software eats the battlefield. Every NATO ally needs C2 modernization. Almost none of them have it. The companies building interoperability — not fighter jets — are the real picks-and-shovels of this cycle.

4.    Aftermarket compounds quietly. When operational tempo rises, readiness beats new starts. TransDigm and HEICO don't get the headlines — they get the recurring cash flows.

5.    Buy what must be bought. You don't have to predict which country buys which platform. Identify the non-negotiables: ammo, comms, sensors, and the digital spine that connects them. The arsenal rebuild is now a policy requirement. The refill order runs for years.

The West didn't just wake up — it hit reorder. And the refill order runs for years

THE NOISE

The cease-fire is here, oil crashed 14%, and the headlines are screaming relief rally. Tom Lee is already calling the bottom. Futures are ripping. Everyone's dusting off their "all-clear" playbooks.

THE SIGNAL

Slow down. WTI is still 44% above where it was before the first shot was fired. The Strait of Hormuz isn't open — Iran is telling ships they need permission to cross. That's not a peace deal, that's a hostage negotiation with a two-week clock on it. The ceasefire is a pause, not a resolution, and the 10-point plan Tehran put forward looks nothing like what Washington says was agreed to.

The bond market reaction tells you what's actually happening here — yields dropped because inflation fear eased, not because the macro picture cleared. Infrastructure damage, elevated shipping insurance, and structural energy repricing don't disappear when Trump posts on Truth Social. Daniela Hathorn at Capital.com called it a "long tail" — and she's right. This shock is still feeding through to corporate earnings and growth numbers over the coming months.

Don't chase the gap up. The ceasefire bought time. It didn't buy certainty.

Short term, SPY will pull an undercut and rally at it’s 200 day moving average this morning…

Intermediate to longer term I’d use this selloff to get into more energy stocks, which are going to get crushed today. As I’ve said in past newsletters, I think you need to have energy stocks, but I wouldn’t chase. Something like XLE has support in the 57ish area and the 50 day moving average at 55.77, which looks like it will hold, at least today. The 50 day is where I would look for a potential undercut and rally.

Meanwhile it looks like gold miners are going to be the best performers today (I’ll take a victory lap on that one)….

Still nowhere near the highs. I might look to take some profits, but I still think you need gold exposure.

Defense stocks will probably take a bit of a hit, see above, I think that’s a buying opportunity as well.

What Iran Tells Us About UFO Disclosure

When governments confront unknown threats in their airspace, defense budgets surge and the same aerospace and surveillance companies move hardest. On March 2nd, Northrop jumped 6% and Lockheed 3.3% on the Iran news — and President Trump has since ordered the formal release of government UAP files, with the Pentagon confirming compliance. So if a conventional conflict can move these stocks this fast, what happens when the bigger story breaks?

See the UFOD holdings:  [thetruthisoutthereufod.com]

Today’s stock is $EQT ( ▼ 2.36% ) ….

As I said above, I think you need energy exposure. So far this would open below it’s 50 day moving average, which is bearish. In a perfect world you get an undercut and rally at the 200 day.

The H.E.A.T. (Hedge, Edge, Asymmetry and Theme) Formula is designed to empower investors to spot opportunities, think independently, make smarter (often contrarian) moves, and build real wealth.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager for Tuttle Capital Management (TCM) and are subject to change without notice. The data and information provided is derived from sources deemed to be reliable but we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Investing in securities is subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Trade notifications are for informational purposes only. TCM offers fully transparent ETFs and provides trade information for all actively managed ETFs. TCM's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Trade notification files are not provided until full trade execution at the end of a trading day. The time stamp of the email is the time of file upload and not necessarily the exact time of the trades. TCM is not a commodity trading advisor and content provided regarding commodity interests is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation. Investment recommendations for any securities or product may be made only after a comprehensive suitability review of the investor’s financial situation.© 2026 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC (TCM). TCM is a SEC-Registered Investment Adviser. All rights reserved.